Everyone of us know the famous episode of the sick of the palsy, healed by Christ, in Mark chapter 2 for example:
9 Whether is it easier to say to the sick of the palsy, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and take up thy bed, and walk?
But in the most of Bible this episode had to be quite manipulated. If God decided before the foundation of the world, whom to save and whom to sent in the Eternal Lake of Fire, evidently the following verses are not the original one, as they are definitely refuting any concept of predestination:
4 And when they could not come nigh unto him for the press, they uncovered the roof where he was: and when they had broken it up, they let down the bed wherein the sick of the palsy lay."When Jesus saw...". Oh what need to see? If He already saw, pardon, decreed the salvation of the sick of the palsy well 4,000 years before, why did He need of an external condition, and instead said: "5 So Jesus said to the sick of palsy, Son, I decreed thy saved before the foundation of the world, no matter the faith of your friends". Well, don't tell me "it not our business to ask God the reason of that". The truth is that there are men who don't want we ask about the fruit of their imagination, claiming it to be "untouchable" because coming "from God".
5 When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee.
There's no manipulation of the Bible. Don't follow the ones who take a verse or a word (there are about only four "predestination" related words in the NT) and cut it out from its context, to try to give Biblical foundation to the suggestions of their imagination. This is not study-Bible, this is manipulation-Bible. Would you follow this path to Hell and lose your salvation for the imagination of a man?
Sunday, October 30, 2016
Chosen to damnation: an unconditionally false doctrine.